Connect with us

Security

Why More Data Doesn’t Automatically Mean Better Decisions

More data doesn’t automatically lead to better IT decisions. This article explores why context, relevance, and proper governance matter more than sheer volume.

Published

on

why more data doesn't automatically mean better decisions

In today’s buzzword-heavy tech landscape, it’s easy to get caught up in catchphrases without fully appreciating what goes into a specific function or operation. One common belief in tech circles is that more data invariably leads to better decision-making. While this idea isn’t entirely misguided, the reality is more complicated — more data doesn’t always result in better decisions. It’s not the volume of data that matters, but how it’s used.

Organizations generate vast amounts of data, with nearly every action quantified in some way. Social media platforms, for example, track likes, clicks, and search history to measure interest in specific topics. Often, data is collected simply because it can be, not because there’s a clear plan for using it.

Anyone who’s worked in IT can point to examples where all that data led to confusion rather than clarity: Conflicting reports and noisy dashboards leading to irrelevant and unactionable information. The fact that most IT teams can easily point to examples of poorly managed data highlights an important issue: The existence of large volumes of data is no guarantee of better outcomes. Extracting actionable insights, while also remaining compliant with regulations, is a complex process. In fact, it’s complex enough to be its own discipline: data governance.

Effective data governance doesn’t mean collecting as much data as possible, it’s about collecting the right data. The right data, in this case, refers to data that is complete, contextualized, and relevant to the task in which it will be used.

Data, Data Everywhere..

A dashboard might alert you to sudden resource usage spikes, but without context i.e., what triggered the spike, whether it’s temporary or sustained, and whether it’s actually impacting users, that information doesn’t get you very far. Data like that raises more questions than it answers. When that missing context is available, teams can respond quickly and proportionately instead of reacting to every spike as if it’s a crisis.

Too much data can also lead to decision fatigue. IT teams are already stretched thin, and constantly dealing with noisy or conflicting information quickly becomes counterproductive.

Quality Over Quantity

In IT especially, more data isn’t always the answer. Going back to dashboards, when they feel overwhelming or stressful instead of helpful, that’s usually a sign that something has gone wrong upstream. At that point, collecting more data isn’t the solution, rethinking how that data is governed and presented is. Clarity beats quantity every time. The goal isn’t to see absolutely everything, it’s to see what matters and use that information to make better decisions.

Advertisement

📢 Get Exclusive Monthly Articles, Updates & Tech Tips Right In Your Inbox!

JOIN 23K+ SUBSCRIBERS

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Security

Be Cautious Of Malicious Apps Even On Trusted App Stores

Most people trust official app stores like Google Play and the App Store for safety — but even these trusted platforms can host malicious apps. Learn why caution is still essential when downloading mobile software.

Published

on

be cautious of malicious apps even on trusted app stores

Most mobile users know to stick to official app stores to download software — and for good reason. Even though legitimate third-party stores exist, the average user can find everything they need on a first-party platform like the Google Play Store or Apple’s App Store. And while Android — unlike apple — does allow sideloading (downloading installation packages directly off the web) even for regular users, this is usually practiced by people who know what they’re doing and are familiar with the risks.

When publishing an app on the Play Store or App Store, a developer has to pass a robust set of vetting processes, both for themselves and their applications. This vetting process involves both automated and manual testing, making these platforms far safer than third-party app stores and other means of installing software. That being said, users are recommended not to blindly trust even these first-party platforms, as there have been several cases where malicious apps slipped through the cracks in the vetting process. And while both Google and Apple are quick to respond when they detect malicious apps on their stores, the very fact that these malicious apps make it onto these platforms is proof that even their strict vetting processes are not foolproof.

How Do These Apps Make It Onto These Platforms?

No verification system is ever completely airtight, especially when you’re dealing with something as complex as app store vetting. For a malicious actor who knows what they’re doing, slipping past automated checks isn’t particularly difficult. In a lot of cases, it boils down to satisfying a specific list of requirements.

The harder part is clearing a manual review, since that involves human judgment. But even that isn’t impossible. A common tactic is to first publish a legitimate, fully functional app for the specific purpose of passing inspection. Once it’s live and has built some credibility, the app quietly receives an update containing malicious code. This is known as versioning. In other cases, the initial version remains harmless but downloads and executes malicious payloads after installation, either after a specific amount of time or due to certain conditions (like account creation or granting certain permissions) being met. That’s what happened with the Anatsa trojan — a campaign that used innocent-looking document viewer apps to deliver banking malware. Once installed, these apps fetched encrypted malicious code from remote servers, giving attackers access to users’ financial data and even access to their accounts.

It also doesn’t help that human reviewers are under constant pressure. With thousands of apps being submitted daily, there’s only so much attention they can give to each one. And then there’s also the fact that verified developer accounts can be hijacked or sold, allowing attackers to publish apps under legitimate names. Not to mention the cases where malicious software which mimics legitimate and trusted apps also end up being published on these stores. Between automated systems, human fatigue, and social engineering, the cracks in the process are wide enough for malicious apps to slip through.

Knowledge Really Is Power

Just because an application has made it to a first-party app store doesn’t automatically make it a legitimate or safe-to-use app. Like we’ve already discussed, as rigorous as the vetting process is, it’s still possible for malicious apps to end up being published on these platforms. As with any cyberthreat, awareness and good judgment are your strongest defenses. Sticking to well-known apps and developers, keeping your software up to date, and reading reviews (not just on the store) are actions you can take to ensure you don’t end up falling victim to a trojan application that has snuck its way onto the Play Store or App Store.

Continue Reading

#Trending